Dr. Mahdi Ganjvar is a highly respected scholar in the Social Sciences whose career reflects a deep commitment to advancing philosophical thought, ethical inquiry, and the intellectual study of human development and societal progress. With strong academic foundations built through formal studies in Islamic philosophy and theology at undergraduate, master’s, and doctoral levels, he has developed a rigorous academic trajectory grounded in classical philosophical traditions and their relevance to contemporary discourse. Dr. Mahdi Ganjvar has extensive academic and administrative experience, having contributed to multiple scholarly committees, curriculum development efforts, postgraduate supervision, and participation in academic conferences at national and international levels. He has published widely in leading journals, producing influential research that bridges traditional philosophical frameworks with modern societal concerns, demonstrating an ability to translate complex theoretical principles into practical insights. His scholarly impact is supported by 62 citations, an h-index of 5, and an i10-index of 2, showcasing the growing influence and sustained engagement his work has achieved in the academic community. Dr. Mahdi Ganjvar’s research interests span philosophical theology, ethical education, the role of reason in social life, liberation theology, intercultural dialogue, spiritual development, social ethics, the interface between philosophy and governance, and the contributions of thinkers such as Mulla Sadra, Avicenna, and other major classical philosophers to contemporary thought. His analyses frequently explore how philosophical insight can guide societal behavior, cultivate peaceful coexistence, and enrich educational systems to support holistic intellectual and moral development. Through publications, teaching, graduate supervision, and participation in academic discourse, he has made meaningful contributions to advancing intellectual scholarship and strengthening the global relevance of classical philosophical perspectives in addressing modern challenges. His ongoing work demonstrates a consistent dedication to thoughtful inquiry, academic excellence, and the creation of knowledge that informs both theoretical understanding and real-world applications. In conclusion, Dr. Mahdi Ganjvar stands as a respected voice in modern philosophical research, with a profile that reflects scholarly credibility, academic leadership, and continued contributions to the evolving landscape of philosophical and social science research.

Profile: Scopus | Orcid | Google Scholar

Featured Publications:

Ganjvar, M. (2019). Islamic model of children’s spiritual education (CSE); Its influence on improvement of communicational behaviour with non-coreligionists. International Journal of Children’s Spirituality, 24(2), 124–139.

Ganjvar, M. (2020). Faith in God, philanthropy and foundations of criticism of religious violence in Mulla Sadra’s philosophy. HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies, 76(1).

Ganjvar, M. (2022). Philosophy for children (PFC) as an educational practice to promote peace and non-violent coexistence. South African Journal of Philosophy, 41(1), 49–60.

Ganjvar, M.,(2018). Religious normative pluralism in Imam Mahdi’s mode of conduct: Imam Mahdi’s pattern of behavior with followers of other religions. Comparative Theology, 9(19), 1–4.

Ganjvar, M. (2021). The role of communication ethics in propagating the Shiite school with emphasis on Razavi teachings. Research Quarterly in Islamic Ethics, 14(51), 93–114.

Ganjvar, M. (2024). Divine solidarity with the oppressed: The socio-political implications of liberation theology in the Christian-Islamic tradition. Journal of Islam and Social Sciences, 16(32), 21–41.

Ganjvar, M. (2012). Modeling the soul in Mulla Sadra’s view. Wisdom and Philosophy, 8(29), 93–116.

Ganjvar, M. (2025). Delineation of gradation neo-theocracy system based on Mullah Sadra’s epistemological opinions. Philosophical Meditations, 14(33), 203–235.

Ganjvar, M. (2023). How can philosophical education contribute to the denial of religious violence? European Journal of Science and Theology, 19(1), 1–20.